Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    21% of websites

kitchenae.com

Contact Support

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

102 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

49 ms

About Website

Visit kitchenae.com now to see the best up-to-date Kitchenae content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about kitchenae.com

Visit kitchenae.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Kitchenae.com page load time and found that the first response time was 102 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

kitchenae.com performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

kitchenae.com

102 ms

suspendedpage.cgi

175 ms

iyfhshsp.com

1889 ms

px.js

74 ms

px.js

74 ms

Our browser made a total of 5 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 40% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Kitchenae.com, 60% (3 requests) were made to Iyfhshsp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) relates to the external source Iyfhshsp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 439 B (37%)

Content Size

1.2 kB

After Optimization

744 B

In fact, the total size of Kitchenae.com main page is 1.2 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 692 B which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 199 B

  • Original 491 B
  • After minification 423 B
  • After compression 292 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 68 B, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 199 B or 41% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 240 B

  • Original 692 B
  • After minification 692 B
  • After compression 452 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 240 B or 35% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

3

After Optimization

3

The browser has sent 3 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Kitchenae. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

kitchenae.com accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

kitchenae.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

kitchenae.com SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Kitchenae.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Kitchenae.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Kitchenae. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: