Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

kitchenreviews.com

KitchenReviews.com: Kitchen Renovation Including Cabinets, Ovens, Refrigerators, Stoves, and Appliance Repair

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

41 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

247 ms

About Website

Visit kitchenreviews.com now to see the best up-to-date Kitchen Reviews content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about kitchenreviews.com

Kitchen Reviews provides kitchen renovation advice, tips on hiring a renovation contractor, reviews and profiles of more than 70 brands of kitchen cabinets, 30 brands of stoves, and 50 brands of refri...

Visit kitchenreviews.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Kitchenreviews.com page load time and found that the first response time was 41 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

kitchenreviews.com performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

34/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

38/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

70/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value900 ms

31/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.098

90/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.5 s

23/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

kitchenreviews.com

41 ms

kitchenreviews.com

83 ms

www.kitchenreviews.com

70 ms

www.kitchenreviews.com

108 ms

main.css

104 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Kitchenreviews.com, 16% (5 requests) were made to Google.com and 9% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Kitchenreviews.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 78.6 kB (22%)

Content Size

359.1 kB

After Optimization

280.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Kitchenreviews.com main page is 359.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 274.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 36.4 kB

  • Original 44.7 kB
  • After minification 41.2 kB
  • After compression 8.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 66 B

  • Original 26.9 kB
  • After minification 26.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Kitchen Reviews images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 38.4 kB

  • Original 274.4 kB
  • After minification 274.4 kB
  • After compression 236.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 38.4 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 3.7 kB

  • Original 13.1 kB
  • After minification 13.1 kB
  • After compression 9.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Kitchenreviews.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.7 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (64%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

9

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Kitchen Reviews. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

kitchenreviews.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

kitchenreviews.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

kitchenreviews.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Kitchenreviews.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Kitchenreviews.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Kitchen Reviews. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: