Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

lafayettealliance.org

Lafayette Alliance Church

Page Load Speed

8.6 sec in total

First Response

3.8 sec

Resources Loaded

4.3 sec

Page Rendered

533 ms

About Website

Visit lafayettealliance.org now to see the best up-to-date Lafayette Alliance content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lafayettealliance.org

Lafayette Alliance Church

Visit lafayettealliance.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Lafayettealliance.org page load time and found that the first response time was 3.8 sec and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lafayettealliance.org performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

92/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.4 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.5 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value380 ms

70/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.213

58/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.6 s

69/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lafayettealliance.org

3817 ms

se_styles.css

37 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

42 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

42 ms

font-awesome.min.css

51 ms

Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 34% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Lafayettealliance.org, 52% (40 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (6 requests) were made to Test.lafayettealliance.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Lafayettealliance.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 942.3 kB (8%)

Content Size

11.5 MB

After Optimization

10.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lafayettealliance.org main page is 11.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 11.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 229.0 kB

  • Original 263.7 kB
  • After minification 262.1 kB
  • After compression 34.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 229.0 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 710.5 kB

  • Original 11.0 MB
  • After minification 10.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lafayette Alliance images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 196.3 kB
  • After minification 196.3 kB
  • After compression 195.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 35.3 kB
  • After minification 35.3 kB
  • After compression 33.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lafayettealliance.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (57%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lafayette Alliance. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

lafayettealliance.org accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

lafayettealliance.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lafayettealliance.org SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lafayettealliance.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lafayettealliance.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lafayette Alliance. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: