Report Summary

  • 63

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 45

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

lauraparette.com

Laura Parette Design: Affordable and Inspired Graphic Design Services for Vermont Businesses

Page Load Speed

939 ms in total

First Response

232 ms

Resources Loaded

518 ms

Page Rendered

189 ms

About Website

Visit lauraparette.com now to see the best up-to-date Laura Parette content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lauraparette.com

As concept unfolds to creation, our graphics are affordable, collaborative, and compelling. From logo development to brochure and catalog design, Laura Parette Design serves all business sizes and sec...

Visit lauraparette.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lauraparette.com page load time and found that the first response time was 232 ms and then it took 707 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lauraparette.com performance score

63

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

68/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.2 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

80/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value170 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.5 s

47/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lauraparette.com

232 ms

jquery.min.js

22 ms

style.css

96 ms

css

49 ms

layout_51.css

78 ms

Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Lauraparette.com, 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (232 ms) belongs to the original domain Lauraparette.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 349.6 kB (30%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

825.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Lauraparette.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 636.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 11.8 kB

  • Original 15.6 kB
  • After minification 12.2 kB
  • After compression 3.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.5 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.8 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 23.0 kB

  • Original 636.6 kB
  • After minification 613.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Laura Parette images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 180.8 kB

  • Original 371.0 kB
  • After minification 360.2 kB
  • After compression 190.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 180.8 kB or 49% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 134.0 kB

  • Original 152.3 kB
  • After minification 123.7 kB
  • After compression 18.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lauraparette.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 134.0 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (58%)

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

11

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Laura Parette. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

lauraparette.com accessibility score

45

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

lauraparette.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

lauraparette.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lauraparette.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lauraparette.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Laura Parette. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: