Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

leanswift.com

LeanSwift | Your Infor M3 Partner

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

142 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

307 ms

About Website

Visit leanswift.com now to see the best up-to-date Lean Swift content for Sweden and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about leanswift.com

LeanSwift is your certified Infor Cloud ERP Alliance partner. We provide everything for your M3 implementations, upgrades and services. Inquire today!

Visit leanswift.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Leanswift.com page load time and found that the first response time was 142 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

leanswift.com performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

35/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.5 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,360 ms

16/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.021

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.6 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

leanswift.com

142 ms

650 ms

launch-e76477606650.min.js

63 ms

clientlib-all.lc-456cbc2cc394c898db78e4b3a792fd38-lc.min.css

18 ms

clientlib-foronly-globaltemplate.lc-228a886107d55d0f8a6a574fa64d226a-lc.min.css

17 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Leanswift.com, 63% (36 requests) were made to Wipro.com and 11% (6 requests) were made to Assets.adobedtm.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (650 ms) relates to the external source Wipro.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 355.8 kB (29%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

865.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Leanswift.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 583.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 100.6 kB

  • Original 116.8 kB
  • After minification 87.4 kB
  • After compression 16.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 29.3 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 100.6 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 24.8 kB

  • Original 583.1 kB
  • After minification 558.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lean Swift images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-44%

Potential reduce by 230.4 kB

  • Original 521.3 kB
  • After minification 521.0 kB
  • After compression 290.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 230.4 kB or 44% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 5 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (51%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

27

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lean Swift. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

leanswift.com accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[role] values are not valid

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

leanswift.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

leanswift.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Leanswift.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Leanswift.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lean Swift. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: