Report Summary

  • 5

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    21% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

leeson.com

LEESON® Electric Motors

Page Load Speed

370 ms in total

First Response

55 ms

Resources Loaded

231 ms

Page Rendered

84 ms

About Website

Welcome to leeson.com homepage info - get ready to check LEESON best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about leeson.com

The LEESON band spans thousands of alternating current (AC) and direct current (DC) motors, gearmotors, washdown and variable-speed control solutions.

Visit leeson.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Leeson.com page load time and found that the first response time was 55 ms and then it took 315 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

leeson.com performance score

5

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.1 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value37.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value20.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value11,140 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.338

33/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value49.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

leeson.com

55 ms

LEESON

49 ms

LEESON

56 ms

v1

54 ms

vef91dfe02fce4ee0ad053f6de4f175db1715022073587

65 ms

Our browser made a total of 5 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Leeson.com, 40% (2 requests) were made to Regalrexnord.com and 20% (1 request) were made to Regalbeloit.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (65 ms) relates to the external source Static.cloudflareinsights.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 341.9 kB (30%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

805.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Leeson.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 761.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 9.0 kB

  • Original 16.0 kB
  • After minification 16.0 kB
  • After compression 7.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.0 kB or 56% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 56.4 kB

  • Original 761.3 kB
  • After minification 704.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. LEESON images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 262.9 kB

  • Original 353.2 kB
  • After minification 312.1 kB
  • After compression 90.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 262.9 kB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 13.6 kB

  • Original 17.0 kB
  • After minification 13.8 kB
  • After compression 3.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Leeson.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.6 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

2

After Optimization

2

The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LEESON. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

leeson.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

leeson.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Requests the geolocation permission on page load

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

leeson.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Leeson.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Leeson.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of LEESON. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: