Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

lidegaardrevision.dk

Revision & Rådgivning i Horsens, Brædstrup og Tørring - Lidegaard Revision & Rådgivning

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

279 ms

Resources Loaded

850 ms

Page Rendered

191 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Lidegaard Revision content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lidegaardrevision.dk

Hos Lidegaard Revision & Rådgivning løser vi revisoropgaver som bogføring, momsregnskab, årsregnskab osv. Samtidig laver vi også uafhængig rådgivning, så du får både overblik og tryghed til at tage vi...

Visit lidegaardrevision.dk

Key Findings

We analyzed Lidegaardrevision.dk page load time and found that the first response time was 279 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lidegaardrevision.dk performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

37/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value900 ms

31/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.2 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lidegaardrevision.dk

279 ms

lidegaard.css

117 ms

5_3zrYcbj98

95 ms

D7WR6V6FkbM

184 ms

frames.js

35 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Lidegaardrevision.dk, 7% (2 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (449 ms) belongs to the original domain Lidegaardrevision.dk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 375.9 kB (67%)

Content Size

557.9 kB

After Optimization

182.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lidegaardrevision.dk main page is 557.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 250.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 8.5 kB

  • Original 12.4 kB
  • After minification 10.9 kB
  • After compression 3.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.5 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.5 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 7.2 kB

  • Original 61.9 kB
  • After minification 54.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lidegaard Revision needs image optimization as it can save up to 7.2 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 152.7 kB

  • Original 233.7 kB
  • After minification 233.6 kB
  • After compression 81.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 152.7 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 207.5 kB

  • Original 250.0 kB
  • After minification 248.1 kB
  • After compression 42.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lidegaardrevision.dk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 207.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (13%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lidegaard Revision. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

lidegaardrevision.dk accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

lidegaardrevision.dk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

lidegaardrevision.dk SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DA

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lidegaardrevision.dk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Danish is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lidegaardrevision.dk main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lidegaard Revision. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: