Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

lifeatpearl.com

Luxury Waterfront Apartments in Virginia Beach | The Pearl at Marina Shores

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

63 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

About Website

Click here to check amazing Lifeat Pearl content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lifeatpearl.com

Savor a one-of-a-kind experience at The Pearl at Marina Shores, the most luxurious apartments in Virginia Beach nestled along the iconic Lynnhaven River.

Visit lifeatpearl.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lifeatpearl.com page load time and found that the first response time was 63 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lifeatpearl.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

52/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.3 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,590 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.109

87/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value36.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lifeatpearl.com

63 ms

lifeatpearl.com

264 ms

remodal.css

96 ms

remodal-default-theme.css

98 ms

marker-library-dialog.css

97 ms

Our browser made a total of 127 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Lifeatpearl.com, 15% (19 requests) were made to Myshowing.com and 4% (5 requests) were made to Lifeatpearl.fatwin.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) relates to the external source Myshowing.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 758.0 kB (30%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lifeatpearl.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 209.5 kB

  • Original 262.5 kB
  • After minification 257.8 kB
  • After compression 53.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 209.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 18.7 kB

  • Original 496.2 kB
  • After minification 477.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lifeat Pearl images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 518.0 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB
  • After compression 1.1 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 518.0 kB or 32% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 11.8 kB

  • Original 122.3 kB
  • After minification 122.3 kB
  • After compression 110.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifeatpearl.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 100 (86%)

Requests Now

116

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 116 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifeat Pearl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 69 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 33 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

lifeatpearl.com accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

lifeatpearl.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

lifeatpearl.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifeatpearl.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifeatpearl.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lifeat Pearl. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: