Access lifebuoy.co.id. Sanitizer, Shampoo, Body & Hand Wash, Bar Soaps

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.7 s

24/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,340 ms

17/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.266

46/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.9 s

27/100

10%

lifebuoy.co.id

497 ms

www.lifebuoy.co.id

477 ms

home.html

20 ms

Our browser made a total of 3 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Lifebuoy.co.id, 33% (1 request) were made to Publish-p34054-e123602.adobeaemcloud.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (497 ms) belongs to the original domain Lifebuoy.co.id.

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

852.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Lifebuoy.co.id main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 697.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 120 B

Original 262 B
After minification 186 B
After compression 142 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 76 B, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 120 B or 46% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 74.3 kB

Original 697.1 kB
After minification 622.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lifebuoy needs image optimization as it can save up to 74.3 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 390.4 kB

Original 604.3 kB
After minification 589.5 kB
After compression 213.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 390.4 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 71.0 kB

Original 86.1 kB
After minification 78.4 kB
After compression 15.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifebuoy.co.id needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 71.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Serves images with low resolution

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

ID
Language Claimed

N/A
Encoding

N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifebuoy.co.id can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lifebuoy.co.id main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lifebuoy. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: