11.3 sec in total
2.4 sec
8.6 sec
283 ms
Click here to check amazing Lifechoice content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lifechoice.co.za
Lifechoice improving your health
Visit lifechoice.co.zaWe analyzed Lifechoice.co.za page load time and found that the first response time was 2.4 sec and then it took 8.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
lifechoice.co.za performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value11.0 s
0/100
10%
Value21.3 s
0/100
25%
Value25.0 s
0/100
10%
Value40 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.086
93/100
15%
Value19.3 s
2/100
10%
2401 ms
318 ms
637 ms
1256 ms
1264 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Lifechoice.co.za, 18% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Lifechoice.co.za.
Page size can be reduced by 89.4 kB (15%)
612.7 kB
523.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Lifechoice.co.za main page is 612.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 285.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 49.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lifechoice images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 18.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifechoice.co.za needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.7 kB or 23% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (88%)
58
7
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifechoice. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
{{url}}
{{time}} ms
lifechoice.co.za accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
lifechoice.co.za best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
lifechoice.co.za SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifechoice.co.za can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifechoice.co.za main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
{{og_description}}
lifechoice.co.za
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lifechoice. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: