Report Summary

  • 13

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

lifepositive.net

holistic wellbeing | spiritual magazine india | Life Positive

Page Load Speed

19.6 sec in total

First Response

46 ms

Resources Loaded

17.1 sec

Page Rendered

2.4 sec

About Website

Visit lifepositive.net now to see the best up-to-date Life Positive content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lifepositive.net

Life Positive magazine is designed to help you live life to its fullest potential and see exponential growth in all aspects, health, career, relationships and mental emotional and spiritual well-being

Visit lifepositive.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Lifepositive.net page load time and found that the first response time was 46 ms and then it took 19.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lifepositive.net performance score

13

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.9 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,340 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.138

79/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lifepositive.net

46 ms

www.lifepositive.com

1526 ms

fbevents.js

26 ms

gtm.js

57 ms

style.css

1325 ms

Our browser made a total of 116 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lifepositive.net, 64% (74 requests) were made to Lifepositive.com and 7% (8 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (8.6 sec) relates to the external source Lifepositive.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 379.4 kB (9%)

Content Size

4.3 MB

After Optimization

3.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Lifepositive.net main page is 4.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 216.6 kB

  • Original 242.6 kB
  • After minification 158.1 kB
  • After compression 26.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 84.5 kB, which is 35% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 216.6 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 50.9 kB

  • Original 3.1 MB
  • After minification 3.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Life Positive images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 99.3 kB

  • Original 850.9 kB
  • After minification 850.9 kB
  • After compression 751.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 99.3 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 12.6 kB

  • Original 66.3 kB
  • After minification 66.3 kB
  • After compression 53.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifepositive.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.6 kB or 19% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (32%)

Requests Now

105

After Optimization

71

The browser has sent 105 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Life Positive. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

lifepositive.net accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

lifepositive.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

lifepositive.net SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifepositive.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifepositive.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Life Positive. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: