Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

lifesnap.jp

出張撮影・出張カメラマンのLIFESNAP | 七五三・お宮参り・家族写真

Page Load Speed

26.8 sec in total

First Response

558 ms

Resources Loaded

26.2 sec

Page Rendered

68 ms

About Website

Welcome to lifesnap.jp homepage info - get ready to check Lifesnap best content for Japan right away, or after learning these important things about lifesnap.jp

家族写真の出張撮影LIFESNAP(ライフスナップ)。少数精鋭のプロカメラマンがお宮参り、七五三、成人式前撮り、誕生日、入学・入園、ニューボーンフォトなど家族の大切な記念日を撮影。東京、千葉、埼玉、神奈川を中心に年間1,000件を超える実績。着物レンタル・出張着付けもサポートで安心！

Visit lifesnap.jp

Key Findings

We analyzed Lifesnap.jp page load time and found that the first response time was 558 ms and then it took 26.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lifesnap.jp performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value21.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value19.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,790 ms

10/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.4 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lifesnap.jp

558 ms

lifesnap.jp

2731 ms

font_notosans_subset.css

619 ms

font_sawarabi_mincho_subset.css

825 ms

font_hannari_subset.css

641 ms

Our browser made a total of 463 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 46% of them (214 requests) were addressed to the original Lifesnap.jp, 52% (240 requests) were made to S3.media-nisor.site and 0% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (12.1 sec) relates to the external source S3.media-nisor.site.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 625.3 kB (12%)

Content Size

5.2 MB

After Optimization

4.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lifesnap.jp main page is 5.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 382.9 kB

  • Original 436.1 kB
  • After minification 388.7 kB
  • After compression 53.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 47.4 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 382.9 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 164.8 kB

  • Original 4.1 MB
  • After minification 3.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lifesnap images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 67.6 kB

  • Original 502.5 kB
  • After minification 499.7 kB
  • After compression 434.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 67.6 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 10.0 kB

  • Original 209.7 kB
  • After minification 209.7 kB
  • After compression 199.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifesnap.jp has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 102 (33%)

Requests Now

308

After Optimization

206

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 308 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifesnap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 60 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

lifesnap.jp accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

lifesnap.jp best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

lifesnap.jp SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifesnap.jp can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifesnap.jp main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lifesnap. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: