Report Summary

  • 84

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    88% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

lifestylepluscentre.com

无码区在线视频,人人肏人人摸,在线看A片一

Page Load Speed

4.6 sec in total

First Response

647 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

1.7 sec

About Website

Visit lifestylepluscentre.com now to see the best up-to-date Lifestylepluscentre content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lifestylepluscentre.com

黄片 不打码,欧美人与拘牲交大全o在线,日韩人人爱,美女高潮乱喷视频,AV无码天堂

Visit lifestylepluscentre.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lifestylepluscentre.com page load time and found that the first response time was 647 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lifestylepluscentre.com performance score

84

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

88/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

91/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value440 ms

64/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.9 s

88/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lifestylepluscentre.com

647 ms

home.css

184 ms

font_2748176_bvpzrxyy7vc.css

19 ms

font_2805178_apwa1emhlkv.css

23 ms

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

248 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 18% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Lifestylepluscentre.com, 26% (10 requests) were made to H.mumbaihotels.net and 15% (6 requests) were made to Hm.baidu.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) relates to the external source Tk2.zaojiao365.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 245.3 kB (16%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Lifestylepluscentre.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 229.1 kB

  • Original 256.6 kB
  • After minification 244.1 kB
  • After compression 27.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 229.1 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 10.6 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lifestylepluscentre images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 3.9 kB

  • Original 37.2 kB
  • After minification 37.2 kB
  • After compression 33.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 5.4 kB
  • After minification 5.2 kB
  • After compression 3.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifestylepluscentre.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.7 kB or 31% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (12%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

30

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifestylepluscentre. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

lifestylepluscentre.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

lifestylepluscentre.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

lifestylepluscentre.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifestylepluscentre.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Lifestylepluscentre.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lifestylepluscentre. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: