Access lilia.com. San Francisco Wedding Photographer

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

67/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value500 ms

58/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.8 s

28/100

10%

lilia.com

460 ms

openid.css

53 ms

style.min.css

109 ms

flo-core-icons.css

158 ms

vendor.css

157 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Lilia.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Lilia.com.

Content Size

619.1 kB

After Optimization

557.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Lilia.com main page is 619.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 299.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 49.1 kB

Original 58.9 kB
After minification 56.2 kB
After compression 9.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

Original 299.0 kB
After minification 296.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lilia images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 8.0 kB

Original 195.5 kB
After minification 195.5 kB
After compression 187.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

Original 65.8 kB
After minification 65.2 kB
After compression 63.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lilia.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lilia. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.