Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 70

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    29% of websites

lineagroup.net

Linea | Business Improvement Consultants | Problem Solved

Page Load Speed

11.3 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

8.7 sec

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

About Website

Click here to check amazing Linea Group content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lineagroup.net

At Linea, our business improvement and change specialists deliver solutions for strategic, operational and financial challenges. Call today to learn more.

Visit lineagroup.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Lineagroup.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 10.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lineagroup.net performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value25.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,640 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.068

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value76.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lineagroup.net

1094 ms

www.linea.net

2926 ms

font-awesome.min.css

88 ms

jquery.min.js

181 ms

bootstrap.min.css

336 ms

Our browser made a total of 132 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lineagroup.net, 70% (92 requests) were made to Linea.net and 7% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) relates to the external source Linea.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (18%)

Content Size

9.1 MB

After Optimization

7.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Lineagroup.net main page is 9.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 7.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 115.3 kB

  • Original 137.0 kB
  • After minification 133.9 kB
  • After compression 21.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 115.3 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 1.5 MB

  • Original 7.9 MB
  • After minification 6.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Linea Group needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.5 MB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 15.4 kB

  • Original 785.3 kB
  • After minification 785.3 kB
  • After compression 770.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 12.8 kB

  • Original 303.0 kB
  • After minification 301.6 kB
  • After compression 290.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lineagroup.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 83 (73%)

Requests Now

113

After Optimization

30

The browser has sent 113 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Linea Group. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 46 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 33 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

lineagroup.net accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

lineagroup.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

lineagroup.net SEO score

70

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lineagroup.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lineagroup.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Linea Group. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: