Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 65

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    78% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

linscan.by

Оборудование для монтажа систем видеонаблюдения, охранной и пожарной сигнализации, электроустановочные изделия - Линскан, Могилев

Page Load Speed

5.3 sec in total

First Response

751 ms

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

701 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Linscan content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about linscan.by

Компания Линскан продает в Могилеве и Могилевской области оборудование для монтажа систем видеонаблюдения, охранной и пожарной сигнализации, электроустановочные изделия.

Visit linscan.by

Key Findings

We analyzed Linscan.by page load time and found that the first response time was 751 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

linscan.by performance score

65

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

80/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

29/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

82/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value310 ms

77/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.05

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.0 s

34/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

linscan.by

751 ms

bootstrap.min.css

281 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

406 ms

mpopup.css

413 ms

main.css

404 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Linscan.by, 8% (2 requests) were made to Api-maps.yandex.ru and 4% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (886 ms) relates to the external source Api-maps.yandex.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 193.2 kB (21%)

Content Size

939.0 kB

After Optimization

745.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Linscan.by main page is 939.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 622.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 160.1 kB

  • Original 231.8 kB
  • After minification 212.0 kB
  • After compression 71.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 160.1 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 23.5 kB

  • Original 622.1 kB
  • After minification 598.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Linscan images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 3.2 kB

  • Original 57.0 kB
  • After minification 57.0 kB
  • After compression 53.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 6.4 kB

  • Original 28.0 kB
  • After minification 28.0 kB
  • After compression 21.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Linscan.by needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.4 kB or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (42%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Linscan. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

linscan.by accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

linscan.by best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

linscan.by SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Linscan.by can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Linscan.by main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Linscan. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: