Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

lintramax.com

Leading oil palm plantation management ERP software system

Page Load Speed

10 sec in total

First Response

18 ms

Resources Loaded

8.9 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

About Website

Visit lintramax.com now to see the best up-to-date Lintramax content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lintramax.com

Leading oil palm plantation management report software system, best agriculture ERP, analytic, cloud computing tech

Visit lintramax.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lintramax.com page load time and found that the first response time was 18 ms and then it took 10 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lintramax.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.8 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,710 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.2 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lintramax.com

18 ms

www.lintramax.com

3639 ms

iconfont-min.css

460 ms

style-min.css

695 ms

responsive-min.css

929 ms

Our browser made a total of 127 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (104 requests) were addressed to the original Lintramax.com, 13% (17 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Lintramax.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 312.7 kB (20%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Lintramax.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 779.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 194.8 kB

  • Original 220.1 kB
  • After minification 207.3 kB
  • After compression 25.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 194.8 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 19.2 kB

  • Original 779.0 kB
  • After minification 759.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lintramax images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 34.4 kB

  • Original 373.4 kB
  • After minification 373.4 kB
  • After compression 338.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 64.2 kB

  • Original 206.9 kB
  • After minification 206.9 kB
  • After compression 142.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lintramax.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 64.2 kB or 31% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (41%)

Requests Now

103

After Optimization

61

The browser has sent 103 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lintramax. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

lintramax.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

lintramax.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lintramax.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lintramax.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lintramax.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lintramax. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: