Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

litepoint.com

Leader of Wireless Cellular Testing Innovations - LitePoint

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

127 ms

Resources Loaded

811 ms

Page Rendered

702 ms

About Website

Welcome to litepoint.com homepage info - get ready to check Lite Point best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about litepoint.com

LitePoint is the leading provider of test solutions for the world’s leading manufacturers of wireless devices covering 5G, UWB, Wi-Fi and Wi-Fi 6E technologies.

Visit litepoint.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Litepoint.com page load time and found that the first response time was 127 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

litepoint.com performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

51/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,100 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.014

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.2 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

litepoint.com

127 ms

www.litepoint.com

133 ms

www.litepoint.com

169 ms

uc.js

36 ms

autoptimize_82b50447bfd99ac54775623695e63ff5.css

54 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Litepoint.com, 31% (8 requests) were made to Fast.wistia.net and 4% (1 request) were made to Consent.cookiebot.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (246 ms) belongs to the original domain Litepoint.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 121.6 kB (18%)

Content Size

666.5 kB

After Optimization

544.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Litepoint.com main page is 666.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 465.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 75.3 kB

  • Original 90.6 kB
  • After minification 90.5 kB
  • After compression 15.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 877 B

  • Original 63.4 kB
  • After minification 62.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lite Point images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 45.4 kB

  • Original 465.2 kB
  • After minification 465.2 kB
  • After compression 419.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 47.4 kB
  • After minification 47.4 kB
  • After compression 47.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Litepoint.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (56%)

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

8

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lite Point. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

litepoint.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

litepoint.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

litepoint.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Litepoint.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Litepoint.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lite Point. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: