Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 9

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

littoral.com

Bateau aluminium Littoral - Bateaux alu professionnels

Page Load Speed

9.5 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

8 sec

Page Rendered

338 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Littoral content for Algeria. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about littoral.com

Bateaux aluminium professionnels : Littoral conçoit des bateaux aluminium sur mesure pour les professionnels de 4 à 30 m.

Visit littoral.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Littoral.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 8.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

littoral.com performance score

9

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value24.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,310 ms

18/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.675

8/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.4 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.littoral.com

1102 ms

jquery.js

505 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

305 ms

revolution.tools.min.js

570 ms

rs6.min.js

685 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Littoral.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Littoral.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.0 MB (57%)

Content Size

3.4 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Littoral.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 78.1 kB

  • Original 96.2 kB
  • After minification 90.6 kB
  • After compression 18.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 690.8 kB
  • After minification 690.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Littoral images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 1.6 MB

  • Original 2.3 MB
  • After minification 2.3 MB
  • After compression 713.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.6 MB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 279.8 kB

  • Original 334.9 kB
  • After minification 324.7 kB
  • After compression 55.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Littoral.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 279.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (83%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Littoral. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 35 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

littoral.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

littoral.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

littoral.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Littoral.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Littoral.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Littoral. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: