Report Summary

  • 2

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    20% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

livecom.net

Contact Center, Voicemail, Interactive Voice Response, MCA......

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

260 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

320 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Livecom content for Turkey. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about livecom.net

Livecom is a global leading provider of OMNI-Channel Contact Center, Voicemail, Interactive Voice Response and Missed Call Alert solutions.

Visit livecom.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Livecom.net page load time and found that the first response time was 260 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

livecom.net performance score

2

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value21.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value52.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value11,340 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.691

7/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.9 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

livecom.net

260 ms

www.livecom.com

966 ms

hotjar-76837.js

139 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

303 ms

styles.css

172 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Livecom.net, 73% (44 requests) were made to Livecom.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Demo.livecom.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (966 ms) relates to the external source Livecom.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 582.5 kB (55%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

471.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Livecom.net main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 468.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 30.0 kB

  • Original 37.7 kB
  • After minification 31.8 kB
  • After compression 7.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.0 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.0 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 7.6 kB

  • Original 302.7 kB
  • After minification 295.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Livecom images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 334.8 kB

  • Original 468.6 kB
  • After minification 436.5 kB
  • After compression 133.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 334.8 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 210.1 kB

  • Original 245.0 kB
  • After minification 204.3 kB
  • After compression 34.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Livecom.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 210.1 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (36%)

Requests Now

58

After Optimization

37

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Livecom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

livecom.net accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

livecom.net best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

livecom.net SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    NL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Livecom.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Dutch language. Our system also found out that Livecom.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Livecom. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: