Access livingvitallife.com. Vital Life Chiropractic

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

46/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

85/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value550 ms

53/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.042

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.9 s

21/100

10%

livingvitallife.com

120 ms

livingvitallife.com

57 ms

9d063d88bd202fd4e1e3304a9368f932.css

23 ms

email-decode.min.js

19 ms

popup.js

111 ms

Our browser made a total of 100 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (88 requests) were addressed to the original Livingvitallife.com, 5% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (205 ms) relates to the external source Cdn6.localdatacdn.com.

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

2.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Livingvitallife.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 117.9 kB

Original 140.5 kB
After minification 138.8 kB
After compression 22.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 117.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 15.9 kB

Original 1.6 MB
After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Living Vital Life images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 32.7 kB

Original 338.7 kB
After minification 338.5 kB
After compression 306.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 333 B

Original 259.9 kB
After minification 259.9 kB
After compression 259.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Livingvitallife.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Living Vital Life. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 72 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.