Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 58

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

loadview-testing.com

Load Testing & Website Performance Tools - LoadView

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

335 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

560 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Load View Testing content for Mexico. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about loadview-testing.com

Real browser-based load testing for websites, web apps, and APIs. Generate user traffic from around the world to gain insight into system performance.

Visit loadview-testing.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Loadview-testing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 335 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

loadview-testing.com performance score

58

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

61/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.7 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value450 ms

63/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.8 s

79/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

loadview-testing.com

335 ms

loadview-testing.com

184 ms

www.loadview-testing.com

241 ms

lbq0u3hp6h

50 ms

lazyload.min.js

54 ms

Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Loadview-testing.com, 29% (20 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Clarity.ms. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (335 ms) belongs to the original domain Loadview-testing.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 765.9 kB (45%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

948.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Loadview-testing.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 422.3 kB

  • Original 490.7 kB
  • After minification 480.7 kB
  • After compression 68.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 422.3 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 343.4 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 879.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Load View Testing needs image optimization as it can save up to 343.4 kB or 28% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 224 B

  • Original 637 B
  • After minification 637 B
  • After compression 413 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 224 B or 35% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (33%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

29

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Load View Testing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

loadview-testing.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

loadview-testing.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

loadview-testing.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Loadview-testing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Loadview-testing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Load View Testing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: