Report Summary

  • 99

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    96% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

lonelyartichoke.com

Default page

Page Load Speed

627 ms in total

First Response

240 ms

Resources Loaded

325 ms

Page Rendered

62 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Lonelyartichoke content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lonelyartichoke.com

Default page

Visit lonelyartichoke.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lonelyartichoke.com page load time and found that the first response time was 240 ms and then it took 387 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lonelyartichoke.com performance score

99

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

92/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.7 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lonelyartichoke.com

240 ms

css2

29 ms

css2

45 ms

rP2tp2ywxg089UriI5-g4vlH9VoD8CmcqZG40F9JadbnoEwARZthTg.ttf

15 ms

rP2tp2ywxg089UriI5-g4vlH9VoD8CmcqZG40F9JadbnoEwAopxhTg.ttf

19 ms

Our browser made a total of 5 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lonelyartichoke.com, 40% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 40% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (240 ms) belongs to the original domain Lonelyartichoke.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 10.5 kB (7%)

Content Size

160.2 kB

After Optimization

149.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Lonelyartichoke.com main page is 160.2 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 92.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 10.3 kB

  • Original 15.8 kB
  • After minification 14.9 kB
  • After compression 5.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.3 kB or 65% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 4 B

  • Original 13.2 kB
  • After minification 13.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lonelyartichoke images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 24 B

  • Original 39.2 kB
  • After minification 39.2 kB
  • After compression 39.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 173 B

  • Original 92.0 kB
  • After minification 92.0 kB
  • After compression 91.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lonelyartichoke.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

2

After Optimization

2

The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lonelyartichoke. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

lonelyartichoke.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

lonelyartichoke.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

lonelyartichoke.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lonelyartichoke.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lonelyartichoke.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lonelyartichoke. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: