Report Summary

  • 86

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

lookingbeyond.com

Looking Beyond Master Psychicss

Page Load Speed

11.5 sec in total

First Response

3.6 sec

Resources Loaded

7.8 sec

Page Rendered

61 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Looking Beyond content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lookingbeyond.com

Visit lookingbeyond.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lookingbeyond.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3.6 sec and then it took 7.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lookingbeyond.com performance score

86

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

66/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

79/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

53/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.5 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

3640 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

166 ms

style.min.css

259 ms

theme.min.css

316 ms

view.min.js

208 ms

Our browser made a total of 7 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Lookingbeyond.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Lookingbeyond.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 80.7 kB (78%)

Content Size

103.0 kB

After Optimization

22.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Lookingbeyond.com main page is 103.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 50.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 41.4 kB

  • Original 50.7 kB
  • After minification 50.6 kB
  • After compression 9.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.4 kB or 82% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 21.1 kB

  • Original 30.5 kB
  • After minification 30.5 kB
  • After compression 9.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 21.1 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 18.2 kB

  • Original 21.8 kB
  • After minification 21.5 kB
  • After compression 3.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lookingbeyond.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (50%)

Requests Now

6

After Optimization

3

The browser has sent 6 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Looking Beyond. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

lookingbeyond.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

lookingbeyond.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

lookingbeyond.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lookingbeyond.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lookingbeyond.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Looking Beyond. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: