Access lounce.com. Agence Web à Toulouse - Création de sites internet

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

54/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

72/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value330 ms

76/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.014

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.9 s

43/100

10%

lounce.com

203 ms

verywell.digital

437 ms

analytics.js

38 ms

align.module.css

89 ms

fieldgroup.module.css

195 ms

Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Lounce.com, 86% (84 requests) were made to Verywell.digital and 3% (3 requests) were made to Static.addtoany.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Verywell.digital.

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Lounce.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 71.0 kB

Original 82.1 kB
After minification 48.0 kB
After compression 11.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 34.1 kB, which is 42% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.0 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 67.7 kB

Original 1.4 MB
After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lounce images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 220.9 kB

Original 664.1 kB
After minification 623.1 kB
After compression 443.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 220.9 kB or 33% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 350.0 kB

Original 397.2 kB
After minification 350.9 kB
After compression 47.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lounce.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 350.0 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lounce. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.