Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 75

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

luggagechoice.com

Suitcases, Briefcases, Garment Bags - Luggage Choice®

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

248 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

251 ms

About Website

Visit luggagechoice.com now to see the best up-to-date Luggage Choice content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about luggagechoice.com

Shop Briggs and Riley Baseline Carry On, Medium, Large Spinner Luggage, Work Backpacks, Rolling Brief, Garment Bags, Wardrobe at Luggage Choice.

Visit luggagechoice.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Luggagechoice.com page load time and found that the first response time was 248 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

luggagechoice.com performance score

75

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

67/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

31/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

81/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.065

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.5 s

83/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

luggagechoice.com

248 ms

luggagechoice.com

457 ms

master_styles-fefd94f7a32be14cfd662c001f992db70fce90011b6210f3062356f21d61f397.css

74 ms

css

49 ms

style-8c9044e6a0ac12309ab34c87870966b38d0a4b59a9547b1632aad6b35ff853ca.css

373 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 11% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Luggagechoice.com, 42% (15 requests) were made to Isteam.wsimg.com and 28% (10 requests) were made to Onlinestore.wsimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (495 ms) relates to the external source Isteam.wsimg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 187.9 kB (14%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Luggagechoice.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 46.8 kB

  • Original 55.6 kB
  • After minification 50.6 kB
  • After compression 8.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 41.7 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Luggage Choice images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-48%

Potential reduce by 82.7 kB

  • Original 172.0 kB
  • After minification 172.0 kB
  • After compression 89.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 82.7 kB or 48% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 16.8 kB

  • Original 21.0 kB
  • After minification 16.8 kB
  • After compression 4.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Luggagechoice.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (40%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Luggage Choice. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

luggagechoice.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

luggagechoice.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

luggagechoice.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Luggagechoice.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Luggagechoice.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Luggage Choice. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: