Access lunaz.co.uk. Home

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.6 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,570 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.931

3/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.8 s

3/100

10%

lunaz.group

266 ms

lunaz.group

391 ms

js

88 ms

style.min.css

340 ms

bootstrap.min.css

343 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Lunaz.co.uk, 7% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (963 ms) relates to the external source Lunaz.group.

Content Size

4.4 MB

After Optimization

4.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Lunaz.co.uk main page is 4.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 104.9 kB

Original 128.4 kB
After minification 124.9 kB
After compression 23.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 104.9 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 848 B

Original 3.7 MB
After minification 3.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lunaz images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

Original 368.7 kB
After minification 368.7 kB
After compression 365.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

Original 144.9 kB
After minification 144.9 kB
After compression 141.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lunaz.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lunaz. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.