Access lunaz.design. Home

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

37/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.1 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value930 ms

30/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.761

5/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.1 s

1/100

10%

lunaz.design

202 ms

lunaz.design

379 ms

js

67 ms

style.min.css

19 ms

bootstrap.min.css

352 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Lunaz.design, 7% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (726 ms) belongs to the original domain Lunaz.design.

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Lunaz.design main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 74.6 kB

Original 93.5 kB
After minification 91.1 kB
After compression 19.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.6 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 41 B

Original 1.9 MB
After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lunaz images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 9.7 kB

Original 414.6 kB
After minification 414.6 kB
After compression 404.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 4.2 kB

Original 104.1 kB
After minification 102.1 kB
After compression 99.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lunaz.design has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lunaz. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.