Access touch.livingsocial.com. LivingSocial: Deals Up to 80% Off: Travel, Events, Dining, Products.

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

56/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

44/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,600 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.6 s

18/100

10%

touch.livingsocial.com

39 ms

touch.livingsocial.com

198 ms

0bc240f9ed29adc04cb2ff217b2da017.js

12 ms

application-76a564cc001bf1bd67cfe5597397de10.js

70 ms

58954684b6837f71b5b867087cb96160.css

69 ms

Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 21% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Touch.livingsocial.com, 16% (16 requests) were made to A5.lscdn.net and 7% (7 requests) were made to Pix.pulsemgr.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source A1.lscdn.net.

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Touch.livingsocial.com main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 65.7 kB

Original 81.2 kB
After minification 69.7 kB
After compression 15.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.6 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.7 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 359.0 kB

Original 2.2 MB
After minification 1.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Touch Living Social needs image optimization as it can save up to 359.0 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 437.4 kB

Original 727.5 kB
After minification 701.2 kB
After compression 290.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 437.4 kB or 60% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 8.6 kB

Original 11.6 kB
After minification 11.6 kB
After compression 3.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Touch.livingsocial.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.6 kB or 74% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Touch Living Social. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.