Access ma-digital.net. MADigital | The GCC's Best Digital Marketing Agency

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

60/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

47/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.1 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,180 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.6 s

4/100

10%

ma-digital.net

45 ms

ma-digital.net

107 ms

6e4xt.css

25 ms

post-11170.css

46 ms

post-11838.css

45 ms

Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 46% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Ma-digital.net, 25% (20 requests) were made to Res.cloudinary.com and 23% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Res.cloudinary.com.

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

787.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Ma-digital.net main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 673.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 177.2 kB

Original 211.7 kB
After minification 207.6 kB
After compression 34.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 177.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 9.2 kB

Original 50.9 kB
After minification 41.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, MADigital needs image optimization as it can save up to 9.2 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 46.7 kB

Original 673.6 kB
After minification 673.6 kB
After compression 626.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 14.4 kB

Original 98.8 kB
After minification 98.8 kB
After compression 84.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ma-digital.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.4 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of MADigital. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.