Access machiningmold.com. Machiningmold.com

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.5 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value140 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.4 s

39/100

10%

machiningmold.com

668 ms

main.min.css

60 ms

css

34 ms

style.min.css

76 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

60 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Machiningmold.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (668 ms) belongs to the original domain Machiningmold.com.

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Machiningmold.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 126.9 kB

Original 150.7 kB
After minification 148.8 kB
After compression 23.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 126.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 9.0 kB

Original 1.4 MB
After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Machiningmold images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 45.1 kB

Original 138.4 kB
After minification 138.4 kB
After compression 93.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 45.1 kB or 33% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 32.3 kB

Original 112.2 kB
After minification 112.2 kB
After compression 79.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Machiningmold.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 32.3 kB or 29% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Machiningmold. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.