Report Summary

  • 8

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

madison-james.com

Madison James

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

165 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

73 ms

About Website

Visit madison-james.com now to see the best up-to-date Madison James content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about madison-james.com

Discover our exquisite modern dresses with our Madison James bridal line. Find styles and designs to suit any bride when you shop Allure Bridals today.

Visit madison-james.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Madison-james.com page load time and found that the first response time was 165 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

madison-james.com performance score

8

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.9 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,470 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.606

10/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.1 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

madison-james.com

165 ms

madison-james.com

283 ms

501 ms

kyp1wos.css

102 ms

theme-bundle.head_async.js

119 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Madison-james.com, 35% (15 requests) were made to Cdn11.bigcommerce.com and 19% (8 requests) were made to Static.klaviyo.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (501 ms) relates to the external source Allurebridals.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 80.0 kB (28%)

Content Size

290.3 kB

After Optimization

210.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Madison-james.com main page is 290.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 213.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 60.0 kB

  • Original 76.8 kB
  • After minification 71.4 kB
  • After compression 16.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.0 kB or 78% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 20.1 kB

  • Original 213.5 kB
  • After minification 213.5 kB
  • After compression 193.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 5 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (85%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

5

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Madison James. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

madison-james.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

madison-james.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

madison-james.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Madison-james.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Madison-james.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Madison James. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: