Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

mailcoding.com

The domain name mailcoding.com is for sale | Dan.com

Page Load Speed

854 ms in total

First Response

93 ms

Resources Loaded

667 ms

Page Rendered

94 ms

About Website

Welcome to mailcoding.com homepage info - get ready to check Mailcoding best content right away, or after learning these important things about mailcoding.com

The domain name mailcoding.com is for sale. Make an offer or buy it now at a set price.

Visit mailcoding.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Mailcoding.com page load time and found that the first response time was 93 ms and then it took 761 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mailcoding.com performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

31/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

80/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,730 ms

10/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.078

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.0 s

34/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

domain_profile.cfm

93 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

51 ms

reboot.min.css

52 ms

style.css

100 ms

responsive.css

339 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Mailcoding.com, 13% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (3 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (339 ms) relates to the external source Static.hugedomains.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 20.8 kB (6%)

Content Size

340.2 kB

After Optimization

319.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Mailcoding.com main page is 340.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 264.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 5.2 kB

  • Original 8.0 kB
  • After minification 8.0 kB
  • After compression 2.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.2 kB or 65% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 761 B

  • Original 13.9 kB
  • After minification 13.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mailcoding images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.5 kB

  • Original 264.4 kB
  • After minification 264.4 kB
  • After compression 261.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 12.3 kB

  • Original 53.9 kB
  • After minification 52.3 kB
  • After compression 41.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mailcoding.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.3 kB or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (58%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mailcoding. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

mailcoding.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

mailcoding.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

mailcoding.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mailcoding.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mailcoding.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mailcoding. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: