Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 53

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 22% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

mailingbox.us

Mailing Box : Gestionnaire Gratuit de Mailinglist, liste de diffusion Gratuite, mailing list Gratuite webservice, MailingBox newsletter 100% webservic...

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

388 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

216 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Mailing Box content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mailingbox.us

MailingBox vous permet la gestion de vos emails et de vos liste de diffusion de mailing list Gratuitement. Créer votre newsletter et gérer vos campagnes d'emailing en ligne, 100% webservice.

Visit mailingbox.us

Key Findings

We analyzed Mailingbox.us page load time and found that the first response time was 388 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mailingbox.us performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.9 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value910 ms

31/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.401

0/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.6 s

29/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mailingbox.us

388 ms

www.mailingbox.com

695 ms

css

74 ms

bootstrap.min.css

165 ms

owl.carousel.css

161 ms

Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Mailingbox.us, 75% (69 requests) were made to Mailingbox.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (995 ms) relates to the external source Mailingbox.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 238.7 kB (15%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Mailingbox.us main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 995.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 31.4 kB

  • Original 38.4 kB
  • After minification 35.2 kB
  • After compression 7.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.4 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 93.4 kB

  • Original 995.4 kB
  • After minification 902.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mailing Box images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 101.3 kB

  • Original 465.0 kB
  • After minification 464.9 kB
  • After compression 363.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 101.3 kB or 22% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 12.7 kB

  • Original 107.0 kB
  • After minification 107.0 kB
  • After compression 94.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mailingbox.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.7 kB or 12% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (76%)

Requests Now

82

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mailing Box. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

mailingbox.us accessibility score

53

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

mailingbox.us best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

mailingbox.us SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mailingbox.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Mailingbox.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mailing Box. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: