Report Summary

  • 97

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    94% of other websites

  • 61

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 27% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 50

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    19% of websites

malonestudio.com

Malone Studio, Inc. Designers, Creators & Restorers of Stained Glass and other Fine Arts

Page Load Speed

842 ms in total

First Response

194 ms

Resources Loaded

541 ms

Page Rendered

107 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Malone Studio content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about malonestudio.com

Malone Studio, Inc. Designers, Creators & Restorers of Stained Glass and other Fine Arts

Visit malonestudio.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Malonestudio.com page load time and found that the first response time was 194 ms and then it took 648 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

malonestudio.com performance score

97

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.9 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

88/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.9 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.7 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

malonestudio.com

194 ms

malone.css

70 ms

logo.jpg

276 ms

fineArtandDesign.gif

136 ms

stainedGlass.gif

136 ms

Our browser made a total of 13 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Malonestudio.com, 15% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (277 ms) belongs to the original domain Malonestudio.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 6.0 kB (4%)

Content Size

139.2 kB

After Optimization

133.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Malonestudio.com main page is 139.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 112.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 5.3 kB

  • Original 8.8 kB
  • After minification 8.7 kB
  • After compression 3.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.3 kB or 61% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 322 B

  • Original 112.2 kB
  • After minification 111.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Malone Studio images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 34 B

  • Original 17.2 kB
  • After minification 17.2 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 340 B

  • Original 1.0 kB
  • After minification 1.0 kB
  • After compression 693 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Malonestudio.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 340 B or 33% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (42%)

Requests Now

12

After Optimization

7

The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Malone Studio. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

malonestudio.com accessibility score

61

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best Practices

malonestudio.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

malonestudio.com SEO score

50

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Document uses plugins

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Malonestudio.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Malonestudio.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Malone Studio. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: