Access margsteel.com. Marg Steel

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

22/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

40/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.9 s

78/100

10%

margsteel.com

2206 ms

style.min.css

250 ms

css

33 ms

style.css

465 ms

blocks.css

469 ms

Our browser made a total of 15 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Margsteel.com, 27% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Margsteel.com.

Content Size

253.7 kB

After Optimization

202.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Margsteel.com main page is 253.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 114.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 44.8 kB

Original 65.3 kB
After minification 64.8 kB
After compression 20.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.8 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

Original 114.9 kB
After minification 114.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Marg Steel images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

Original 40.7 kB
After minification 40.7 kB
After compression 38.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 4.8 kB

Original 32.8 kB
After minification 32.8 kB
After compression 28.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Margsteel.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.8 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Marg Steel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.