398 ms in total
62 ms
146 ms
190 ms
Welcome to marketingcomparison.com homepage info - get ready to check Marketing Comparison best content right away, or after learning these important things about marketingcomparison.com
Compare free mail house quotes from leading suppliers and get free buying advice for direct mail marketing.
Visit marketingcomparison.comWe analyzed Marketingcomparison.com page load time and found that the first response time was 62 ms and then it took 336 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.
marketingcomparison.com performance score
62 ms
6 ms
16 ms
44 ms
47 ms
Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Marketingcomparison.com, 10% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (62 ms) belongs to the original domain Marketingcomparison.com.
Page size can be reduced by 22.7 kB (49%)
46.7 kB
24.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Marketingcomparison.com main page is 46.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 17.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 11.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.3 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 11.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Marketingcomparison.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.3 kB or 86% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
20
20
The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Marketing Comparison. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
{{url}}
{{time}} ms
marketingcomparison.com SEO score
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Marketingcomparison.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Marketingcomparison.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
{{og_description}}
marketingcomparison.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Marketing Comparison. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: