Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

marystack.com

Mary's Tack and Feed - Online Tack & Horse Feed Store

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

101 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

233 ms

About Website

Welcome to marystack.com homepage info - get ready to check Mary S Tack best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about marystack.com

Shop Mary's Tack and Feed for a great selection of English and Western tack, horse riding apparel and horse gifts at low prices and with fast, secure shipping.

Visit marystack.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Marystack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 101 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

marystack.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value23.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.9 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,760 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.118

85/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value27.1 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

marystack.com

101 ms

marystack.com

631 ms

css

150 ms

theme-7ed85a50-0279-013d-b9bb-1a0f27063358.css

170 ms

optimize.js

187 ms

Our browser made a total of 106 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Marystack.com, 47% (50 requests) were made to Cdn11.bigcommerce.com and 8% (8 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (754 ms) relates to the external source Cdn11.bigcommerce.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 341.5 kB (5%)

Content Size

7.5 MB

After Optimization

7.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Marystack.com main page is 7.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 6.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 259.8 kB

  • Original 311.3 kB
  • After minification 272.6 kB
  • After compression 51.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 38.7 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 259.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 23.4 kB

  • Original 6.7 MB
  • After minification 6.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mary S Tack images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 58.2 kB

  • Original 455.6 kB
  • After minification 455.6 kB
  • After compression 397.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 58.2 kB or 13% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (44%)

Requests Now

100

After Optimization

56

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 100 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mary S Tack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

marystack.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

marystack.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

marystack.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Marystack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Marystack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mary S Tack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: