Access mathewporter.co.uk. Web Design Nottingham | Web Developer Nottingham

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

37/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.2 s

59/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,040 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.136

80/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.9 s

21/100

10%

www.mathewporter.co.uk

645 ms

style.css

187 ms

css

37 ms

style.min.css

455 ms

styles.css

188 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Mathewporter.co.uk, 15% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (645 ms) belongs to the original domain Mathewporter.co.uk.

Content Size

913.2 kB

After Optimization

370.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Mathewporter.co.uk main page is 913.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 682.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 23.9 kB

Original 31.3 kB
After minification 29.6 kB
After compression 7.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.9 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 6.5 kB

Original 37.4 kB
After minification 30.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Mathew Porter needs image optimization as it can save up to 6.5 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 396.2 kB

Original 682.9 kB
After minification 680.9 kB
After compression 286.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 396.2 kB or 58% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 116.2 kB

Original 161.5 kB
After minification 160.4 kB
After compression 45.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mathewporter.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 116.2 kB or 72% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mathew Porter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.