Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

matrixtravel.co.uk

Retail & Construction Corporate Travel Management | EFR Travel Group

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

281 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

461 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Matrix Travel content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about matrixtravel.co.uk

Specialists in Retail & Construction Corporate Travel Management. Discover how we can save you money on your corporate travel requirements today.

Visit matrixtravel.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Matrixtravel.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 281 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

matrixtravel.co.uk performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

49/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.9 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

45/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,530 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.1 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

281 ms

all.css

48 ms

v4-shims.css

63 ms

page.js

115 ms

jquery.min.js

36 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Matrixtravel.co.uk, 14% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com and 11% (4 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (281 ms) relates to the external source Efrtravel.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 350.8 kB (40%)

Content Size

880.8 kB

After Optimization

530.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Matrixtravel.co.uk main page is 880.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 425.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 346.8 kB

  • Original 425.1 kB
  • After minification 423.1 kB
  • After compression 78.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 346.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 149.5 kB
  • After minification 146.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Matrix Travel images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 255.8 kB
  • After minification 255.8 kB
  • After compression 254.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 50.4 kB
  • After minification 50.4 kB
  • After compression 50.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Matrixtravel.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (46%)

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

14

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Matrix Travel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

matrixtravel.co.uk accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

matrixtravel.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

matrixtravel.co.uk SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Matrixtravel.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Matrixtravel.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Matrix Travel. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: