Access maxwatermit.com. ????ͧ?Ѵ?С͹,?ѧ?ص??ˡ???,?ҡ?С͹,recycle, ?????? ,EM ,DAF,?ҡ?ص??ˡ???,????????????????,?ӺѴ???????,?Ѻ?ӨѴ?С͹...

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value8,400 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.011

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value33.3 s

0/100

10%

maxwatermit.com

569 ms

www.maxwatermit.com

639 ms

salesdesk-widget-v2.min.js

993 ms

widgets.js

99 ms

jquery-1.3.2.js

465 ms

Our browser made a total of 110 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Maxwatermit.com, 25% (28 requests) were made to Vc1i.rweb-images.com and 11% (12 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (16.4 sec) relates to the external source Vc1i.rweb-images.com.

Content Size

6.3 MB

After Optimization

2.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Maxwatermit.com main page is 6.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 89.6 kB

Original 106.0 kB
After minification 103.4 kB
After compression 16.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.6 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 3.4 MB

Original 5.6 MB
After minification 2.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Maxwatermit needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.4 MB or 60% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 26.1 kB

Original 488.1 kB
After minification 488.1 kB
After compression 462.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

Original 64.6 kB
After minification 64.6 kB
After compression 63.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Maxwatermit.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Maxwatermit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.