Access meda36.it. MEDA45 - Agenzia di comunicazione integrata digitale a Milano

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

56/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

83/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

37/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value650 ms

46/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.6 s

29/100

10%

meda36.it

391 ms

www.meda45.it

633 ms

css2

35 ms

plugins.css

186 ms

style.css

369 ms

Our browser made a total of 125 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Meda36.it, 92% (115 requests) were made to Meda45.it and 3% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (848 ms) relates to the external source Meda45.it.

Content Size

3.7 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Meda36.it main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 41.9 kB

Original 49.4 kB
After minification 30.7 kB
After compression 7.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.7 kB, which is 38% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-51%

Potential reduce by 1.7 MB

Original 3.3 MB
After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Meda 36 needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.7 MB or 51% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 57.5 kB

Original 303.9 kB
After minification 303.9 kB
After compression 246.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 57.5 kB or 19% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 21.9 kB

Original 71.3 kB
After minification 71.3 kB
After compression 49.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Meda36.it needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 21.9 kB or 31% of the original size.

Requests Now

118

After Optimization

104

The browser has sent 118 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Meda 36. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.