Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

meteorage.com

Homepage - METEORAGE

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

369 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

938 ms

About Website

Welcome to meteorage.com homepage info - get ready to check METEORAGE best content for France right away, or after learning these important things about meteorage.com

Our innovative solutions for your thunderstorms and lightning risk management, tailored to your business and challenges.

Visit meteorage.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Meteorage.com page load time and found that the first response time was 369 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

meteorage.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

65/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.5 s

88/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value970 ms

28/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.195

63/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.7 s

45/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

meteorage.com

369 ms

www.meteorage.com

838 ms

app.js

409 ms

02.-Logo-METEORAGE-horizontal-blanc.png

338 ms

Power-plant-Home-qotw80qfc8unr1qqtt3evst8xq2rgijuxkb8chnyd4.png

430 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Meteorage.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Meteorage.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 423.8 kB (4%)

Content Size

11.3 MB

After Optimization

10.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Meteorage.com main page is 11.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 11.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 280.5 kB

  • Original 339.8 kB
  • After minification 329.3 kB
  • After compression 59.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 280.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 143.2 kB

  • Original 11.0 MB
  • After minification 10.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. METEORAGE images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

30

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of METEORAGE. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

meteorage.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

meteorage.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

meteorage.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Meteorage.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Meteorage.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of METEORAGE. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: