Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

misscharlott.com

misscharlott.com

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

248 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

192 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Misscharlott content for France. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about misscharlott.com

This domain may be for sale!

Visit misscharlott.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Misscharlott.com page load time and found that the first response time was 248 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

misscharlott.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.0 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.8 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,390 ms

16/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.9 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

misscharlott.com

248 ms

www.misscharlott.com

678 ms

default.css

156 ms

style.css

246 ms

tooltip.css

159 ms

Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Misscharlott.com, 7% (7 requests) were made to Pixel.mathtag.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Staticxx.facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (806 ms) belongs to the original domain Misscharlott.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 806.3 kB (48%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

864.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Misscharlott.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 908.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 27.1 kB

  • Original 34.9 kB
  • After minification 30.8 kB
  • After compression 7.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.1 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.1 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 40.5 kB

  • Original 669.2 kB
  • After minification 628.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Misscharlott images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 690.9 kB

  • Original 908.6 kB
  • After minification 859.4 kB
  • After compression 217.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 690.9 kB or 76% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 47.8 kB

  • Original 58.3 kB
  • After minification 49.4 kB
  • After compression 10.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Misscharlott.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 47.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (36%)

Requests Now

92

After Optimization

59

The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Misscharlott. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

misscharlott.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

misscharlott.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

misscharlott.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Misscharlott.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Misscharlott.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Misscharlott. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: