Report Summary

  • 7

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

mo.milesplit.com

MoMileSplit | Missouri High School Running News and Videos | Cross Country and Track & Field

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

36 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

422 ms

About Website

Welcome to mo.milesplit.com homepage info - get ready to check Mo Mile Split best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about mo.milesplit.com

MoMileSplit has the latest Missouri high school running, cross country, and track & field coverage. Get rankings, race results, stats, news, photos and videos.

Visit mo.milesplit.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Mo.milesplit.com page load time and found that the first response time was 36 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mo.milesplit.com performance score

7

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

20/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value19.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10,370 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.466

19/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value53.7 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mo.milesplit.com

36 ms

osano.js

334 ms

osano-flo.js

68 ms

reset.css

143 ms

font-awesome.min.css

70 ms

Our browser made a total of 110 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Mo.milesplit.com, 27% (30 requests) were made to D193frjqb908ar.cloudfront.net and 15% (16 requests) were made to Js.sp.milesplit.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source D193frjqb908ar.cloudfront.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 667.2 kB (27%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Mo.milesplit.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 97.2 kB

  • Original 122.3 kB
  • After minification 100.6 kB
  • After compression 25.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 21.7 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 97.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 435.6 kB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Mo Mile Split needs image optimization as it can save up to 435.6 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 105.9 kB

  • Original 450.3 kB
  • After minification 411.5 kB
  • After compression 344.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 105.9 kB or 24% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 28.5 kB

  • Original 74.6 kB
  • After minification 70.8 kB
  • After compression 46.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mo.milesplit.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 28.5 kB or 38% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (51%)

Requests Now

97

After Optimization

48

The browser has sent 97 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mo Mile Split. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

mo.milesplit.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

SEO Factors

mo.milesplit.com SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mo.milesplit.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mo.milesplit.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mo Mile Split. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: