Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 54

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

mobileaccess.com

In Building Cellular Wireless Solutions | 5G Indoor Coverage Solutions | Corning

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

147 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

888 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Mobileaccess content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mobileaccess.com

Corning Everon Network Solutions offer in-building wireless cellular solutions to meet a broad array of design scenarios and mitigate RF propagation challenges.

Visit mobileaccess.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Mobileaccess.com page load time and found that the first response time was 147 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mobileaccess.com performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

43/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

56/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.6 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,970 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.028

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.6 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mobileaccess.com

147 ms

www.mobileaccess.com

308 ms

cellular-solutions.html

46 ms

cellular-solutions.html

131 ms

fonts.css

47 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Mobileaccess.com, 86% (36 requests) were made to Corning.com and 2% (1 request) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (700 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 715.7 kB (32%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Mobileaccess.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 672.0 kB

  • Original 786.6 kB
  • After minification 766.4 kB
  • After compression 114.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 672.0 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 25.9 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mobileaccess images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 56 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression.

CSS Optimization

-92%

Potential reduce by 17.8 kB

  • Original 19.3 kB
  • After minification 17.9 kB
  • After compression 1.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mobileaccess.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.8 kB or 92% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (19%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

25

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mobileaccess. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

mobileaccess.com accessibility score

54

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a valid value for its [lang] attribute.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

mobileaccess.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

mobileaccess.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mobileaccess.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mobileaccess.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mobileaccess. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: