Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 6

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    21% of other websites

  • 58

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 25% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

montemar.nl

Hotel Montemar Maritim | Vanaf €35,- |Santa Susanna | Solmar

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

358 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

184 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Montemar content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about montemar.nl

Op vakantie naar Santa Susanna v.a. €35,-? Kies voor Hotel Montemar Maritim! Aan de boulevard ✓ Uitstekend eten ✓ Bij het strand ✓ Boek uw kamer direct!

Visit montemar.nl

Key Findings

We analyzed Montemar.nl page load time and found that the first response time was 358 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

montemar.nl performance score

6

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.4 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,280 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.378

28/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value34.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

montemar.nl

358 ms

702 ms

app.min.css

276 ms

widgets.css

45 ms

widgets.js

63 ms

Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Montemar.nl, 70% (48 requests) were made to Solmar.nl and 6% (4 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Solmar.nl.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 918.8 kB (12%)

Content Size

8.0 MB

After Optimization

7.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Montemar.nl main page is 8.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 7.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 145.5 kB

  • Original 177.5 kB
  • After minification 117.2 kB
  • After compression 32.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 60.3 kB, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 145.5 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 638.9 kB

  • Original 7.2 MB
  • After minification 6.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Montemar images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 109.9 kB

  • Original 564.0 kB
  • After minification 564.0 kB
  • After compression 454.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 109.9 kB or 19% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 24.5 kB

  • Original 28.3 kB
  • After minification 28.2 kB
  • After compression 3.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Montemar.nl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.5 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (25%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

47

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Montemar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

montemar.nl accessibility score

58

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

montemar.nl best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

montemar.nl SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NL

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Montemar.nl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Montemar.nl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Montemar. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: