Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 49

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

mooxar.info

ムラムラってくる素人のサイトを作りました 詳細データ比較 評価レビュー 感想体験談 口コミ評判 有料アダルト動画おすすめサイト比較ランキング

Page Load Speed

16.2 sec in total

First Response

507 ms

Resources Loaded

7.1 sec

Page Rendered

8.6 sec

About Website

Visit mooxar.info now to see the best up-to-date Mooxar content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mooxar.info

ムラムラってくる素人のサイトを作りました 詳細データ比較 評価レビュー 感想体験談 口コミ評判について解説しています。有料アダルト動画おすすめサイト比較ランキングでは、実際に入会した体験談を元に価値のある有料のアダルト動画サイトを評価し比較して、長年の経験からおすすめのものやランキングを紹介しています。

Visit mooxar.info

Key Findings

We analyzed Mooxar.info page load time and found that the first response time was 507 ms and then it took 15.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mooxar.info performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

18/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.2 s

20/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value900 ms

31/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.219

57/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.0 s

64/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mooxar.info

507 ms

style.css

152 ms

foundation.css

291 ms

raleway.css

92 ms

small-bathroom_ideas.jpg

6 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 12% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Mooxar.info, 5% (2 requests) were made to Kenbihag.files.wordpress.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Catnipoflife.files.wordpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.6 sec) relates to the external source Paw.princeton.edu.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 645.3 kB (8%)

Content Size

8.1 MB

After Optimization

7.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Mooxar.info main page is 8.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 7.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 310.9 kB

  • Original 401.9 kB
  • After minification 397.3 kB
  • After compression 91.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 310.9 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 121.0 kB

  • Original 7.4 MB
  • After minification 7.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mooxar images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 213.4 kB

  • Original 237.6 kB
  • After minification 192.7 kB
  • After compression 24.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mooxar.info needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 213.4 kB or 90% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (10%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

27

  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mooxar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

mooxar.info accessibility score

49

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

mooxar.info best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

mooxar.info SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mooxar.info can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Mooxar.info main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mooxar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: