Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 29% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 71

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

morningsave.com

MorningSave: Big Savings. Top Brands. New Daily.

Page Load Speed

9.2 sec in total

First Response

189 ms

Resources Loaded

6.9 sec

Page Rendered

2.1 sec

About Website

Welcome to morningsave.com homepage info - get ready to check Morning Save best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about morningsave.com

Visit morningsave.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Morningsave.com page load time and found that the first response time was 189 ms and then it took 9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

morningsave.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.4 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.6 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value18,620 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.119

85/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value32.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

morningsave.com

189 ms

morningsave.com

529 ms

js

6250 ms

index-d47baa742359954c9e91ac09cfbbac8a5f9edfb1.css

31 ms

tfdrwguwjte6jz0p19xr.webp

55 ms

Our browser made a total of 249 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Morningsave.com, 74% (185 requests) were made to D2b8wt72ktn9a2.cloudfront.net and 11% (28 requests) were made to Jnn-pa.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.3 sec) relates to the external source Tagmanager.morningsave.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 299.3 kB (25%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

882.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Morningsave.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 444.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 251.8 kB

  • Original 279.2 kB
  • After minification 160.2 kB
  • After compression 27.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 119.0 kB, which is 43% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 251.8 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 11.8 kB

  • Original 444.2 kB
  • After minification 432.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Morning Save images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 35.7 kB

  • Original 339.5 kB
  • After minification 339.3 kB
  • After compression 303.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 35.7 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 5 B

  • Original 119.4 kB
  • After minification 119.4 kB
  • After compression 119.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Morningsave.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (9%)

Requests Now

237

After Optimization

216

The browser has sent 237 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Morning Save. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

morningsave.com accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

morningsave.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

morningsave.com SEO score

71

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Morningsave.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Morningsave.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Morning Save. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: