Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 48

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 50

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    18% of websites

mum.org

Museum of Menstruation and Women's Health

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

323 ms

Resources Loaded

471 ms

Page Rendered

3.9 sec

About Website

Welcome to mum.org homepage info - get ready to check Mum best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about mum.org

New York Times recommends MUM, which has exhibits about the world cultural history of menstruation and women's health

Visit mum.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Mum.org page load time and found that the first response time was 323 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mum.org performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value13.9 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.9 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value160 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.588

11/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.7 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mum.org

323 ms

9k=

2 ms

2Q==

4 ms

9k=

3 ms

9k=

5 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Mum.org, 83% (29 requests) were made to and 3% (1 request) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (323 ms) belongs to the original domain Mum.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 977.0 kB (37%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Mum.org main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 976.0 kB

  • Original 2.6 MB
  • After minification 2.3 MB
  • After compression 1.6 MB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 275.5 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 976.0 kB or 38% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 41 B

  • Original 9.7 kB
  • After minification 9.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mum images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 971 B

  • Original 6.8 kB
  • After minification 6.8 kB
  • After compression 5.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 971 B or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

5

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mum. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

mum.org accessibility score

48

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

mum.org best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

mum.org SEO score

50

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1252

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mum.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Mum.org main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mum. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: